Roland McGrath writes: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:35:56PM +0200, Andreas Voegele wrote: >> > In /include/bits/errno.h both ENOTSUP and ECANCELED get the value >> > _HURD_ERRNO(118). Is this intended? >> >> I don't think so. Roland can you fix this if it is wrong? > > They certainly should not have the same number. The Hurd numbers > are determined by magic comments in libc/manual/errno.texi; it > appears that someone added some codes to errno.texi with magic > comments and picked some random numbers for them (probably Linux > numbers) instead of omitting them. That needs to be fixed. Can you > compare all the numbers in errno.texi with those that existing Hurd > binaries were really using, and assign unused numbers to any excess > errno codes the Hurd didn't previously have?
Currently, errno values are assigned in the ranges 1-81 and 100-118. I think that ENOTSUP and ECANCELED are the only duplicates (besides EAGAIN and EWOULDBLOCK). _HURD_ERRNOS is 119. _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd