QNX is able to be a successful MicroKernel, but why NOT GNUMach /
OSKITMach / L4Mach ? So, what could be the problem with GNU
Microkernels ? QNX is using GNU tools and they are
successful. Where we are lacking ? coding style / documentation /
info on creating a MicroKernel ? QNX don't have partition
limitation like we have with ext2. Even device driver is also
implemented without any problem...
QNX is non-free, so it is not successful in our eyes. You also
confuse Mach with the Hurd, GNU Mach does not have such limits, it is
the Hurd that has the >2GB limit. User-space device drivers haven't
been implemented because nobody has implemented them, this is all a
volunteer project, we work in our spare time and pick what we find
interesting/important/etc.
Cheers!
_______________________________________________
Help-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
