Tim Rühsen wrote: > From what I can see in the libunistring sources, it is based on Unicode > 9.0.0
Correct. > while 0x7fd has been introduced with Unicode 11.0 [2]. Yes, apparently so, when you look at http://www.unicode.org/charts/ . > So something here might be out of sync. Yes, it is inevitable that different software supports different versions of Unicode. Unicode is an evolving standard. > if there are any plans to upgrade to Unicode 11.0. To me, adding a sensible API for meta-information on Emojis has higher priority than just updating the table to Unicode 10, 11, 12. The latter is useful only for a very small number of use-cases. Bruno
