наб <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> The transitional libidn11-dev package can be dropped when all reverse >> dependencies have stopped using it. > Looks to me like we're there. > >> root@68d340bc8331:/# apt-cache rdepends libidn11-dev > libidn11-dev` > Reverse Depends: > libidn-dev > libidn-dev
Good! > udd=> select source from sources where build_depends like '%libidn11-dev%' > and release = 'sid' ; > source > -------------------- > biboumi > courier > courier > courier-authlib > eiskaltdcpp > foxeye > hesiod > jabber-muc > jreen > libnet-libidn-perl > libpodofo > nextepc > psi > psi-plus > (14 rows) > > So so long as libidn-dev gains Provides: libidn11-dev, this should be good? Nice list. Hmm, is it really sufficient with a Provides to get apt to install libidn-dev, when building those packages? Don't we have to file bugs on all of those packages? /Simon jas@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn -b libidn11-dev Will remove the following packages from unstable: libidn11-dev | 1.42-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x Maintainer: Debian Libidn Team <[email protected]> ------------------- Reason ------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: biboumi: libidn11-dev courier: libidn11-dev courier-authlib: libidn11-dev eiskaltdcpp: libidn11-dev foxeye: libidn11-dev hesiod: libidn11-dev jabber-muc: libidn11-dev jreen: libidn11-dev libnet-libidn-perl: libidn11-dev libpodofo: libidn11-dev nextepc: libidn11-dev psi: libidn11-dev psi-plus: libidn11-dev Dependency problem found. jas@coccia:~$
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
