On 2012-11-25 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/25/2012 09:24 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > I am not sure, but should these three functions really be versioned
> > LIBTASN1_0_3 in libtasn1.map? 

> I was thinking about it, but since these functions don't exist in the
> previous versions shouldn't this be ok?

Hello,

afaik it should not cause any breakage, labeling a symbol added in 3.1
as LIBTASN1_0_3 just looked strange. ;-)
cu andreas

-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

Reply via email to