On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 06:15:27PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > So I can't see how the old code really sorted like it's supposed > to. We're probably lacking a test case that checks the result of > the coding is really what we produced. But this seems more likely > to actually produce the expected output.
So looking at the current test cases you can make Test_tree output it things. It seems that this patch doesn't make any change in output and I have to wonder if I there was something in the old code that I missed or that it worked by accident. Kurt
