%% Noel Yap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ny> I think this was mentioned on the list a month or so ago and I was ny> against the idea at the time. I've since changed my mind. The ny> RFE is that the following should be allowed:
ny> .NOT_PARALLEL: %.pm %_wrap.cc ny> %.pm %_wrap.cc: %.swg ny> $(SwigAction) ny> which would mean that %.pm and %_wrap.cc files should not be built ny> in parallel to one another. But, that isn't what that pattern rule means. %.pm and %_wrap.cc are _NOT_ built "in parallel to one another". That syntax tells make that it can build _both_ files with only _one_ invocation of the command script. That's not the same thing at all. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
