On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Mark Galeck (CW) <[email protected]>wrote:
> >mv include1/foo.h include1/foobar.h > > Now we are still in trouble. Because the timestamp for foobar.h, created > this way, would be as old as foo.h. And so yes make will notice that the > new foobar.h is there, but will think it is an old file, older than > include/foobar.h, and now again foobar.o will not be rebuilt. > If you mv a file, all files which included the old name must be edited, and therefore also rebuilt. :-? -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
_______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
