Jed Jia wrote: > It works well, but seems a little inconvenient. Do I have to use > CANONICAL_PATH on every file path? Yeah, it doesn't make the makefile more readable. You must use it whenever there is a risk that the path is not in its canonical form.
> And I wonder whether this is a future of make or just a bug? Well, I would consider it as a nice-to have but missing feature of make. Maybe someone with more background knowledge than mine could comment on why make does not just do the path normalization. _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
