Hi Luke, On 01/02/16 21:29, Luke Shumaker wrote: > Having to keep track of the bar's, baz's, qu+x's didn't help either :)
Sorry; I realised after posting that it might be a burden. > Here is an "improved" makefile that I think demonstrates the situation > more clearly. [Snip an improved makefile] > Besides changing names, I also moved the "correct" branch up, to > remove the possibility that it was choosing the "mislead" branch > simply because it was listed first, which is what make does if > everything else ties. I understood that it shouldn't matter anyway, because they're not branches from the same point, i.e., they don't have the same target. Cheers! _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
