Hi, Thanks a bunch for the explanation, that would indeed explain it. On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:30:36PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > At the very least it seems like the value of RM should not be unset. > It should either be marked as left at its "default" value (because it > was "set" when ?= was run) or it should be changed to the new value.
> But having it be not defined seems to me to be incorrect. Do you want me to file a bug report somewhere? Kind regards, Reto
