Eray Aslan <eray.as...@caf.com.tr> writes: > On 08/15/2012 08:46 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> However, I wonder what MIT/Heimdal does, or >> what other servers do, like sshd? > > MIT/Heimdal default to using LOG_AUTH for syslog. sshd also uses > LOG_AUTH afaik. > >> On systems I'm >> familiar with, reading the syslog requires the same privileges as >> reading the authlog > > Usually but not always. Use LOG_AUTH and let the sysadmin decide?
So should we use LOG_AUTH for all messages from shishid, then? That sounds the most logical to me. Everything shishid does is authentication related. /Simon _______________________________________________ Help-shishi mailing list Help-shishi@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-shishi
