Canol Gokel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But I also have a lot of and: messages in my code so again finding the > right one is difficult.
However, this one was part of an #evaluate: or a top-level statement. Even if you were to update the backtrace to use line number info from the CompiledCode, this would not help you with #evaluate:d code. Otherwise, the backtrace would tell you which method of yours the #and: was in. If this is an issue for normal methods, that's a good sign your methods are too long. (Of course, I'm making broad generalizations, not seeing your code.) -- But you know how reluctant paranormal phenomena are to reveal themselves when skeptics are present. --Robert Sheaffer, SkI 9/2003 _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
