On Wed, 27 May 2009 14:21:03 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you on amd64? If so, that's the same as > http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/264 Yes I am. Somehow I managed to overlook #264 while checking if this was already known. I'm duplicating my setup on one of my servers, let me know if you want to take a look there. s. > > > mprotect(0, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot > > allocate memory) > > No, it's a NULL-pointer access. The mprotect fails, so GNU Smalltalk > decides it's a real SIGSEGV rather than one that is handled by the > generational garbage collection machinery. > > > NB: Looking at the trace file made me wonder > > > > $ grep localtime gst-rem.log | wc -l > > 715 > > > > Why does gst-remote check /etc/localtime *that* often? > > tzset, probably. I should fix that. > > Paolo > -- Stefan Schmiedl EDV-Beratung Schmiedl, Berghangstr. 5, D-93413 Cham im Büro: 09971 9966 989, am Handy: 0160 9981 6278 _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
