Hello Paolo,
thanks for your reply, I already though, that there's not much interest
in logging in the smalltalk-group. (Beside, I only found a small
logging-tool for squeak and an html-logger for VW.)
What about CRITICAL, ERROR, WARNING, NOTICE, INFO, DEBUG/ALL (these are
six of the eight loglevels used by Linux, see man syslog).
Ok, my first intention was to name it like the ones in the java-logging,
(but I don't realy like the fine, finer, finest naming). I'll switch it
to the naming recommended by you.
I have no connectivity as I'm writing this, did you write some
testcases? With them, I would seriously consider including it in the
tarball.
I assume, you need some SUnit Testcases?
(I have included only an ugly Test.st, which only gives some comments
like "you should now only see 'xyz' log-messages" or "please control the
test.html file that it contains only the log-messages for xyz severities".)
Regards,
Joachim.
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
