On 12/16/2010 09:23 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/16/2010 09:17 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> when I know that I will add/remove items from an OrderedCollection in >> multiple >> processes, I should always go through a critical section? Or is there some >> nice guarantee on atomicity of these operations? > > Nope, the possibility that the OC must grow pretty much eliminates all > guarantees.
thanks. Is there a container with built-in synchronization? or a generic wrapper that handles doesNotUnderstood and then calls the wrapped class with the lock held? _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
