On 01/16/2011 11:34 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
 From a quick look at the socket/ipv4/ipv6 impl I don't see anyone assigning
sk_err to anything in case of a failed bind, so I am not sure where the
SO_ERROR != 0 on failed bind is coming from.

FWIW I don't understand even where is that connect sets sk_err in the Linux socket code... However I think accept is safe because it may be a blocking call.

We need testcases and I like your start. I didn't merge it yet, but I like your way to prod. :)

Paolo

_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk

Reply via email to