On 04/21/2011 07:52 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> but you're walking on thin ice here. Every time you have a timeout,
> you should assume that the data structures are in an inconsistent
> state (just like when you #terminate a Process). I suggest making
> your sockets unbuffered if it's not too much overhead.
Right. It is not Erlang after all and we have side-effects. I am not sure on
the semantics of the following. My work around would be something like
[
socket waitUntilItCanRead
] timeout...
but I am not sure if canRead and such will behave better.
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
