On 07/04/2011 12:48 PM, Gwenael Casaccio wrote: > Is it better Paolo ? What's the difference from v1? I see nothing of what I asked for:
>> Modulo the usual comments about irrelevant hunks :) it looks good, >> thanks! Can you however ensure the invariant that the queue is empty >> upon entry to _gst_mark, by making it accept an OOP? I believe this >> simplifies the code and lets you add back the tail recursion >> optimization you removed. >> >> And it would be even better if you could keep the distinction between >> marking one OOP and marking a range, because it removes a lot of traffic >> to/from the mark queue (a bit cheaper than the stack because of no stack >> frame overhead, but still expensive cache-wise). Which in turn means, >> keep the API as is! :) Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
