Issue status update for
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/648
Post a follow up:
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/648
Project: GNU Smalltalk
Version: <none>
Component: VM
Category: bug reports
Priority: normal
Assigned to: Unassigned
Reported by: zecke
Updated by: bonzinip
Status: active
It's not nice, but I don't think it's a bug (only a QoI issue). The
bytecode is indeed invalid.
One alternative is to rewrite the bytecodes to something that fails more
nicely (for example adding a primitive that does "self
invalidInstanceVariableAccess").
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
