Il 26/11/2012 17:07, Holger Hans Peter Freyther ha scritto: > > I think it's simpler to leave this method aside. Code using > > #next/#atEnd will simply not call #rowCount. > > Okay, then I change the documentation to not call rowCount when > atEnd/next? is used? E.g. for Postgres one can query the size of > the resultset.
Yes, I think this would be better. We would need a separate method name if #rowCount could return -1 (or better, nil) on SQLite. Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
