On 29/05/2013 13:37, Ladislav Marek wrote:
It has been reported here
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-smalltalk/2011-07/msg00035.html
.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther
<[email protected]> wrote:
Issue status update for http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/issue/770
Post a follow up: http://smalltalk.gnu.org/project/comments/add/770
Project: GNU Smalltalk
Version: <none>
Component: Base classes
Category: bug reports
Priority: normal
Assigned to: Unassigned
Reported by: MrGwen
Updated by: zecke
Status: active
We are playing ping-pong here. The +1 was changed to a -1 in
dd1f241bf27756bfa41057bc6368483dc25c3da7. This change doesn't have a
testcase and I couldn't find the bug description in the mailinglist
archive.
So by changing it back to +1 we will break something. So please create a
new testcase that shows your issue and can be used for regression
testing.
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
So here is the code:
PackageLoader fileInPackage: 'DebugTools'.
b := [ 1 printString: 10 ].
d := Debugger on: b newProcess.
[d suspendedContext method == b block]
whileFalse: [d stepBytecode].
5 timesRepeat: [
d step.
d suspendedContext method printNl.
d currentLine printNl ].
and the output:
Integer>>printString:
1
Integer>>printString:
0
Integer>>printString:
6
Integer>>printString:
14
Integer>>printString:
8
there are two errors: line 0 and line 14
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
