On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:55:23PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > I think this is because I am not changing classPragmas to add my new
> > class pragmas.
>
> Yes.
I stumbled across another issue. In the GSM 04.08 specs Information
Elements (attributes) have a minimum and maximum length. I have used
something like the below to handle that.
Object subclass: Foo [
Foo class >> valueSize: min max: max [
]
<valueSize: 1 max: 3>
]
this can not be expressed with the current classPragmas. So if I would
return #valueSize from the classPragmas then the 'max' would be lost
and if I return #valueSize:max: then it can not perform this selector?
Any idea how to resolve that?
> > Is this something we could/should warning about?
>
> Not for all pragmas; some (import:, shape:) are filed out automatically.
> But these are just a few, they could be special cased out. Otherwise
> it seems like a useful warning.
I will add this as another linter (but I think the STInST ast doesn't
have enough information for the pragmas to detect it).
holger
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
