On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:21:01PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > So is it possible that the suspended process is also the get_active_process
> > at that time? And then it gets re-inserted into the waiting list?
>
> Doesn't sound impossible. I'll take a look next week (full week of free
> time hacking!)
Yeah! We have plenty of fun stuff waiting. :)
diff --git a/libgst/prims.def b/libgst/prims.def
index 72add2b..65d4eb3 100644
--- a/libgst/prims.def
+++ b/libgst/prims.def
@@ -2873,6 +2873,8 @@ primitive VMpr_Process_suspend [succeed,check_interrupt]
oop1 = STACKTOP ();
suspend_process (oop1);
+ if (oop1 == switch_to_process)
+ printf("Suspended is switched to process.\n");
PRIM_SUCCEEDED;
}
st> a := nil. p := [a := 3 ] newProcess
nil
Process(nil at userSchedulingPriority, suspended)
st> p singleStep; suspend
Suspended is switched to process.
Semaphore(nil: held, 0 waiting processes)
So we suspend the process but it is still the process we want to switch
to. I don't know the semantics here too well. E.g. why doesn't this happen
with the interpreter and what is the right way a suspended process should
become ready-to-run again?
holger
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
