Il 20/01/2014 20:30, Holger Hans Peter Freyther ha scritto:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:30:52PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The patch looks good.
Alternatively, what about this? It is a bit clearer to me, but the
logic is pretty much the same.
Thanks!
(self timedWaitOn: sem) ifTrue: [
- proc signalInterrupt: (Kernel.TimeoutNotification on: self).
+ timeout = 0 ifTrue: [
+ proc signalInterrupt: (Kernel.TimeoutNotification on:
self)].
].
If we ever get the execution of multiple native processes the timeout
code and the aBlock ensure:[] could run at the same time. How would we
make that mutual exclusive? add a lock/token then?
We probably would need syntax for atomic compare and exchange of OOPs.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
