On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:48:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Yes, this is why I was reluctant to do this.
I understand but I think portability is more important.
> > I could cheat and add another "cache" for Behavior>>#new or make it
> > another kind of primitive?
>
> Making it another primitive would lower that cost. Sounds like a good idea.
Okay, I have one conceptual issue.
a.) VMpr_Behavior_basicNewInitialize will lookup_selector (cache) and
notice that Object>>#initialize is an empty method and we can skip the
call.
b.) >>#initialize is custom with real code but I calling
_gst_send_message_internal will not lead to the code being executed
but we already return from the primitive. What would be nice is to
have a PRIM_SEMI_SUCCEED and just call >>#initialize. This doesn't seem
to be possible right now.
what do you think?
holger
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
