Il 13/09/2014 20:58, Holger Hans Peter Freyther ha scritto: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 08:25:24PM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > Dear Paolo, > > > >> This was pointed out by the clang compiler. Current access can >> be either 0 or 1 but I think we want to be able to pass it as >> integer as well. It looks like this code has never been executed >> and we might just remove the call by number. > > what do you think about removing it? I added an abort to the codepath > and ran make check. It is not hit and I don't think external code is > calling that primitive either.
Yeah, it's not been used for several years probably, and DLD would be a better way to hook into open(2) nowadays. Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
