On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 05:44:52PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote: > That sounds bad. I don't want to spawn a new process whenever I send a > message to the smalltalk scripts for performance reasons (unless running > a smalltalk process is so lightweight you don't notice it). Do I have to > use a different call? I didn't find anything better than this.
Smalltalk processes are cheap. You need an execution environment for thisContext and others and the easiest is to create a temporary call-in process. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
