> On 22 May 2015, at 05:43, Holger Freyther <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, >> And see a fix in >> http://smallissimo.blogspot.fr/2015/04/removing-ub-in-bytecodeprimmultiply.html. > > oh, I think my preference is to go with __builtin_mul_overflow (or for clang > the smull > variant as it can’t derive the types itself). The benefit of these routines > is that one > passes plenty of semantics that the compiler can generate efficient code. The hack solution would be to add -frwapv and I just added this to the build and the integer tests started to work on OSX. I am not sure we want to carry this check all the time. _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
