on the face of it, this interest in packaging GNU software could be seen as encouraging; but that i dont understand the motivation for doing this - if you do not use smalltalk yourself, and you dont know anyone who does, and the GNU smalltalk maintainers have not asked for this
do you just go about finding random softwares to package for flatpack? if so, that sounds like you are flattering the flatpack project by adding smalltalk to it more than flattering smalltalk by packaging it for flatpack pardon my cynicism o/c - i dont speak for the project myself, but IMHO i am quite against that sort of "kitchen-sink" packaging
pgpY1sH60Oeq0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
