>> I end up with needlessly long names that take no advantage of context, > What names did you want to use originally? Are you saying that you > wanted to have several nodes called "Persistence"?
No, I want to strip the "in Relational Database" because that will still be in the user's short-term memory because he got there on purpose, normally: @node Persistence in Relational Databases @chapter Persistence in Relational Databases @menu * Object Identity:: * Mapping Inheritance:: * Persisting Simple Types:: * Persisting References:: * Persisting Collections:: * Using Predicates with the Relational Tool:: * Exercising the Relational Tool:: @end menu @node Object Identity @section Object Identity > Anyway, "Persistence in Relational Databases" doesn't sound too long > to me. The triplet next/previous/top can end up taking a lot of place. It nearly wraps on my ThinkPad X40. But it's mostly the redundancy that annoys me. -- Jean-Louis Leroy Sound Object Logic http://www.soundobjectlogic.com _______________________________________________ Texinfo home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-texinfo
