On 27 November 2016 at 20:27, Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On second thoughts, this is already possible. The best way at the
> moment, I think, to underline text would be to output strings in the
> output like this:
>
> this text isn't underlined UNDERLINE_ONbut this text is.UNDERLINE_OFF
>
> Then after you get, say, the HTML output, search for all instances of
> UNDERLINE_ON (or UNDERLINE_OFF) and change them to <ul> (or </ul>).
>
Thinking again, this isn't necessary because you can just do
@inlineraw{html, <ul>}. I don't know if underlining is possible for
any of the other output formats. but if it were, it would have to be
coded separately for each of them.