Hi, Diffs of .texi files are often hard to review, because the committer has reformatted (refilled) the paragraph.
The Linux man-pages project has this guidance to avoid this problem (in groff -mandoc source, not in .texi files): [1] Use semantic newlines In the source of a manual page, new sentences should be started on new lines, and long sentences should be split into lines at clause breaks (commas, semicolons, colons, and so on). This convention, sometimes known as "semantic newlines", makes it easier to see the effect of patches, which often operate at the level of individual sentences or sentence clauses. Has anyone already used this convention for .texi files? Is it a good convention to follow? Bruno [1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/man-pages.7.html