On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 08:41:08PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> > Well, I would say that it is borderline. I do not like that it
> > is ok in @table and not in @vtable for instance, the constructs correct
> > in both should be the same.
> >
> > Even if it not exactly the same and probably does not gives you the
> > exact expected output, I think that the following would be a more
> > expected construct:
> >
> > @table @code
> >
> > @item label1
> > @anchor{label1}
> > Text1
> >
> > @end table
>
> But this gives an ugly result. When clicking on "labelX" (and there is
> much text prior to it) then the browser screen will look like
>
> label1
> <top-of-screen>
> Text1
>
> i.e. label1 is not visible. What I want is
>
>
> <top-of-screen>
> label1
> Text1
I do not deny that, I understand perfectly that the output you want to
generate is with the hyperlink at the beginning of the @item line. But
the solution to do that is not very consistent with the kind of Texinfo
code that would be expected.
Maybe a tree transformation that associates anchors following an @item
to the @item could be another possibility, but it is not very attractive
either.
--
Pat
