Thanks, Gavin. I've been trying exactly that, mostly relying on tables. Benjamin Kalish Cataloger / Technology Librarian Forbes Library Technical Services
[email protected] 413-587-1011 Support Forbes Library: - Consider giving a gift <https://forbeslibrary.org/giving/donate-online/> to Forbes Library - Vote for the Friends of Forbes in the Florence Bank Community Grant Program <https://www.florencebank.com/vote>. - Join the Friends of Forbes today <https://forbeslibrary.org/friends/>! Currently reading: *Jumpnauts* by Hao Jingfang Just Finished: *Children of Memory* by Adrian Tchaikovsky For information about accessibility at the library, please see: http://forbeslibrary.org/accessibility/ On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 2:59 PM Gavin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:24:42AM -0400, Benjamin Kalish wrote: > > I'm wondering if there is a way to add a level to Texinfo's hierarchy, so > > that there is a level below subsubsection. I'm including files > > using @include, @lowersections and @raisesections, and occasionally I > > "bottom out" and end up with a partially flattened hierarchy where there > > should be a fifth level. The content is very hierarchical in nature, so > > retaining this structure is very desirable! > > For better or for worse, this is not possible. You could try to reduce > the number of levels. Without seeing the manual in question it is hard > to make specific suggestions. You could try using the @table command > for the lowest level of structuring if it is appropriate for the content, > which would give an extra level. > > It may be confusing for the reader to have too many levels of structuring. > They could get lost in the manual and find it hard to navigate. >
