On Saturday, April 25th, 2026 at 10:06 AM, Patrice Dumas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 08:43:44PM +0000, Heime wrote: > > On Saturday, April 25th, 2026 at 8:38 AM, Patrice Dumas <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 07:31:07PM +0000, Heime wrote: > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Why do I get "antares.texi:18: raising the section level of @section > > > > which is too low"? > > > > > > That is because there is a gap betweenn @top and @section, there should > > > be a @chapter or similar (@unnumbered, @appendix) between the @top and > > > the @section. > > > > Do program manuals use chapters? > > Yes, they do. > > > Is the suggestion to always use at least > > one of @chapter, @unnumbered, or @appendix as top level declaration? > > Yes. (Not technically top level, as @top is even more top level, as is > @part). > > -- > Pat I could not see in the manual, the minimal working document possibilities, Or the usual structuring for various types of documents. Would doing so make the manual too difficult to understand? Examples like \input texinfo [@part] @chapter/@unnumbered/@appendix [@section] [@appendix] @bye
