Thanks. I'll contact you again when 5.0 tests are configured. Steve Ebersole wrote:
>AFAIK, yes. In scanning through a lot of the unexpected failures, the >ones I saw were all caused by an issue with handling temp tables in >MySQL, which I am already aware of... > >-----Original Message----- >From: Aleksandar Kostadinov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:15 AM >To: Steve Ebersole >Cc: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >Subject: Re: [Fwd: hibernate-mysql-testsuite Build Completed With >Testsuite Errors] > >I'll create a build against 5.0 but first I need a confirmation about >existing tests. >Are they ok? > >Steve Ebersole wrote: > > > >>Well, I'd much prefer using MySQL 5 as that is now the supported >>production ready line and is the version I test against locally. I >>guess ideally both 4.x and 5.x, if that would be possible, since I am >>sure people will continue using 4.x for quite q while. >> >>If adding or moving to 5.0 is not possible, then this is fine. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Aleksandar Kostadinov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 6:58 AM >>To: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org; Steve Ebersole >>Subject: [Fwd: hibernate-mysql-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite >>Errors] >> >>Hi again. >>Please review the results with mysql 4.1.22 (latest 4.1). There are 2 >>tests more passing than with the old one (4.1.10a). >> >>Do the results satisfy you so I can move to the next database or mysql >>should be tunned better? >> >>Thanks, >>Aleksandar >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev