Sorry, Manik, tests were failing w/ NoSuchMethodError and I saw your
recent change in hibernate trunk to remove use of
DefaultCacheFactory.getInstance() and assumed the method was gone. My
bad :-(
Perhaps problem is loss of generics info in the class file?
2.1.0.GA:
public static <K, V> CacheFactory<K, V> getInstance()
3.0.0.CR1:
public static DefaultCacheFactory getInstance()
Failure I see is:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.jboss.cache.DefaultCacheFactory.getInstance()Lorg/jboss/cache/CacheFactory;
at
org.hibernate.cache.jbc2.builder.SharedCacheInstanceManager.createSharedCache(SharedCacheInstanceManager.java:193)
I don't remember exactly how I tested this yesterday, but messing with
it today, I can reproduce by:
1) revert pom in my checkout of the 3.3.1 tag so it uses JBC 2.1.0.GA
2) revert any compiled classes back to the original 3.3.1
mvn -Dmaven.test.skip.exec=true clean install
3) change the pom so it uses JBC 3.3.0.CR1 and JGroups 2.6.5
4) run the testsuite
mvn -Ptest test
....
Tests run: 225, Failures: 0, Errors: 21, Skipped: 0
5) force a new compile and then retest:
mvn -Ptest clean test
...
Tests run: 225, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Problem is people using a 3.3.1 binary don't get to recompile. ;)
Manik Surtani wrote:
Weird, getInstance() was removed in early ALPHAs, and was replaced again
pretty quickly - in 3.0.0.BETA1, even.
http://fisheye.jboss.org/browse/JBossCache/core/tags/3.0.0.BETA1/src/main/java/org/jboss/cache/DefaultCacheFactory.java?r=6676
2008/10/18 Jason T. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Brian Stansberry wrote:
Steve Ebersole wrote:
so JBC 3 needs this change anyway?
Yes, if it wants to go in, say, JBoss AS 5.2. Which I'm quite
sure the JBC team wants, since they made a bunch of other more
significant changes to ensure compatibility. This one's real
trivial.
at which point it would be a total
drop-in replacement?
Yes. I just did a diff between head of trunk (which passes 100%
w/ JBC 3.0.0.CR1 plugged in) and the hibernate-3.3.1.GA
<http://hibernate-3.3.1.GA> tag and the only differences are two
places where the missing DefaultCacheFactory.getInstance() call
was replaced.
I fixed this compatibility problem awhile ago, but it could have
been after CR1 was tagged.
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
