On 08/14/2009 03:26 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote: > On 08/13/2009 06:27 AM, Galder Zamarreno wrote: >> Hi Brian, >> >> Of my original email, there's a section that I don't think has been >> answered yet >> >> On 08/04/2009 10:37 AM, Galder Zamarreno wrote: >>> Finally, a question to the list, specially for Brian/Steve who worked on >>> the JBC2/3 integration layer: >>> >>> - Do we need a similar timestamp region local cache implementation for >>> an ISPN based cache provider? >>> >>> Cheers, >> >> This question focuses on the TimestampsRegionImpl (and potentially >> ClusteredConcurrentTimestampsRegionImpl) work done for JBC 2.x/3.x >> integration layer. Is there a need for a similar region implementation >> for Infinispan? I'm not sure I fully understand the need for >> TimestampsRegionImpl to manage this local cache. >> > > Timestamps caching has different semantics than the other types, hence > the different region impl. I don't know any reason why that wouldn't be > the case with Infinispan. > > It's not a "local cache"? It's replicated.
Yeah, it's replicated, got confused with query cache. > >> Talking about timestamps, I assume that no evictions should ever happen >> for the timestamps cache and this is something that could be validated >> on startup, that eviction strategy is NONE. >> > > +1. > >> Cheers, > > -- Galder ZamarreƱo Sr. Software Engineer Infinispan, JBoss Cache _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev