that cglib with annotations issue only shows when using cglib to instrument the domain class in compile time.
but I'd agree with drop it, actually i'm happy with that :D, cglib issues has taken too much time from us On May 12, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > I fixed the bug where field level annotations are swallowed (patch not > applied by the CGLIB team though) > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2796998&group_id=56933&atid=482368 > > But I could not fix the bug where generics information is simply swallowed > (not enough internal knowledge). > > I think we should focus on Javassist. > > On 12 mai 2010, at 03:14, Steve Ebersole wrote: > >> I thought one of the issues was that cglib does not handle annotations? >> That's a pretty big 'workaround' if that's the case. >> >> >> -- Sent from my Palm Pre >> st...@hibernate.org >> http://hibernate.orgOn May 11, 2010 1:06 PM, Strong Liu >> <st...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> these are the issues Steve mentioned below: >> >> >> >> http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-4703 >> >> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPAPP-2971 >> >> >> >> to be fair, these issues can be workaround, and we already have patches, >> users who run into these issues can pick up our patch for cglib and rebuild >> it themselves. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On May 11, 2010, at 10:34 PM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: >> >> >> >> > Is there any advantage of CGLIB over javassist? >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, 11 May 2010 16:24:12 +0200, Steve Ebersole >> <st...@hibernate.org> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> I think the time has come to drop CGLIB support :( It is just >> becoming >> >> >> near impossible to get them to respond to issues. We even recently >> sent >> >> >> them 2 patches of major issues and still cannot get them to apply >> the >> >> >> changes upstream and cut releases. >> >> >> >> >> >> So that leaves us the choice of deprecating CGLIB support and >> eventually >> >> >> dropping it altogether or forking it. I personally do not want to >> fork >> >> >> it, mainly because I do not want to have to maintain it. Anyway >> lets >> >> >> discuss it this week if need be and we'll vote at the meeting >> monday. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > hibernate-dev mailing list >> >> > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
