https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10121
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:19 AM Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:36:05PM +0000, Steve Ebersole wrote: > > Its really a different discussion Hardy. The discussion here is > > whether EntityManagerFactory().getProperties() should return values that > > were not passed in the Map when building the EntityManagerFactory. > > Sure. Different, but related. The assumption in our test was that the > properties > passed via the persistence bootstrap, are also then exposed via > EntityManagerFactory().getProperties(). This used to be the case and hence > the test passed. > > > Yes the spec says that ValidatorFactory should be passed as part of the > > "configuration Map" when building the EMF. However, WF does not do it > that > > way. Hibernate supports passing the ValidatorFactory in as part of the > > "configuration Map", but it also supports this proprietary 2-phase > approach > > developed for WF. > > Sure. > > > All that said, there are other cases where we explicitly handle certain > > settings to be returned from EntityManagerFactory().getProperties(). > > Things like Connection info defined in the persistence.xml we explicitly > > transfer into the Map backing EntityManagerFactory().getProperties(). So > > the question is whether a similar thing makes sense for ValidatorFactory. > > I would think so. Being able to access the ValidatorFactory via > EntityManagerFactory().getProperties() > makes sense to me. I would give it a +1 > > --Hardy > > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev