I just sent the request.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:26 PM Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> wrote: > On 10 December 2015 at 17:48, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43 AM Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> > > wrote: > >> > >> On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> > BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the > JBoss > >> > Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JBoss Mailman they used to > set > >> > up a > >> > number of lists by default. We just chose to not really use this one > in > >> > particular. We could use this one for purpose discussed here. > >> > >> Yes, that would be nice. I'm registered on that list, and there have > >> been questions already although they are extremely rare - I recall > >> something like 3 a year? - probably because I don't think its > >> existance was ever advertised. > > > > > > Not sure. Mailman is not great at showing "list statistics". Actually > it > > kind of sucks as an archive (not searchable, segmented, etc). > > > > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-users/ > > > > > >> > BTW, I looked into creating a Hibernate SO Team. Are we thinking one > >> > team? > >> > Or one per project (ORM, OGM, etc)? > >> > >> Depends on how it works? I do monitor various tags, including > >> "hibernate", "hibernate-search", "hibernate-ogm" and sometimes do a > >> cross-check query like "hibernate" + "lucene", although others on our > >> team often arrive first to answer. > >> > >> If the intent of the feature is to distribute the load among people to > >> answer and monitor such tags, then I guess you're not interested in > >> being notified for the Lucene related ones? > >> > >> From what I understand here: > >> - > >> > http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/307513/the-power-of-teams-a-proposed-expansion-of-stack-overflow > >> > >> It looks like it's more about showing off our affiliation, and to > >> create a space were people can ask questions "about the team". > >> So I'd say a single team unless I misunderstood things. > > > > > > That would be my vote as well: one team > > Let's start with one then! > If future features warrant a more fine-grained approach for some > practicality reasons, we'll consider making sub-groups as an addition, > but I guess in terms of community it makes sense to build up a single > strong brand. > > Will you set it up? > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev