+1 for that. Stumbled over that once or twice in the past and wondered what the reasons were.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Christian Beikov* Am 27.03.2017 um 19:37 schrieb Steve Ebersole: > In all versions of Hibernate to-date we have required that the Java type of > an id be Serializable. Strictly speaking JPA has no such restriction - it > says ids can be any Object type *unless* the entity is to be serialized, in > which case the id must be Serializable (duh). > > As we transition into 6.0, I wonder if we want to loosen this restriction > and allow the id to be any Object type as well. There really is no valid > reason (beyond the obvious case explicitly discussed in the JPA spec) for > requiring the id to be Serializable. > > WDYT? > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev