+1 for the creation of the branch upstream and everything Yoann said. One curiosity, once there is an alpha, why would you delete the whole branch? Couldn't you change everything on the existing branch without deleting it? It's unusual to rewrite the history of upstream branches but we have done it before.
PS: Sorry if you received this email twice, I made a mistake On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:20 PM Davide D'Alto <daltodav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for creating the branch upstream and everything Yoann said. > > One curiosity, once there is an alpha, why would you delete the whole branch? > Couldn't you change everything on the existing branch without deleting it? > While it's unusual to rewrite the history of upstream branches, we > have done it before. > > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:50 PM Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > > > I'd also be fine with moving to upstream as wip/6.0 with the understanding > > that this branch can be re-written and will eventually be deleted. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018, 1:13 AM Yoann Rodiere <yo...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > > > > I think it would be better to at least move the code to a 6.0 branch on > > > the main repository, just so that the code is a little easier to find for > > > external contributors/users. Even if it's named "6.0-wip" to mention that > > > you may end up rewriting history on that branch. If we release binaries, > > > then the code is official and should be in plain sight. > > > > > > But if it's not an option, just pushing the 6.0.0.Alpha1 tag to the main > > > repository would be a step in the right direction. > > > > > > Yoann Rodière > > > Hibernate NoORM Team > > > yo...@hibernate.org > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 at 00:25, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, 23:39 Gail Badner <gbad...@redhat.com wrote: > > >> > > >> > That's fine with me. > > >> > > > >> > > >> +1 But could you push the release tag to the reference repo? Just to make > > >> sure we have it for future reference. > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:29 AM Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > This Wednesday we plan to release 6.0 Alpha1 and I thought it best to > > >> > start > > >> > > discussing how to best handle the 6.0 and master branches. > > >> > > > > >> > > I think we should keep 6.0 a little while longer in my fork and 5.4 > > >> > > as > > >> > > master until 6.0 becomes more stabilized to make it easier for 5.4 > > >> > > maintenance. And reconsider as we approach Beta1. > > >> > > > > >> > > But this affects everyone, so wanted to see what others thought... > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > >> > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > >> > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > >> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > >> > > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> > hibernate-dev mailing list > > >> > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> hibernate-dev mailing list > > >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
