> 1. add the child element to the children set.
> 2. save the child explicitly by calling
> Session.save(child).
> Is it right?

If you have enabled cascades, you can skip (2).

> By specifying "readonly", in the code I have to
> remember which set is readonly and I have to handle it
> differently from set that is not readonly.
> Is this right ?

Ansolutely not. You always treat both ends the same;
your application should not be aware of this detail
of the mapping.

**********************************************************************
Any personal or sensitive information contained in this email and
attachments must be handled in accordance with the Victorian Information
Privacy Act 2000, the Health Records Act 2001 or the Privacy Act 1988
(Commonwealth), as applicable.

This email, including all attachments, is confidential.  If you are not the
intended recipient, you must not disclose, distribute, copy or use the
information contained in this email or attachments.  Any confidentiality or
privilege is not waived or lost because this email has been sent to you in
error.  If you have received it in error, please let us know by reply
email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
**********************************************************************





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
hibernate-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel

Reply via email to