Wouldn't that mean that we would get both versions of CGLIB in our lib directory?

Perhaps its better to just wait until Proxool has also upgraded. Perhaps we can
put some pressure on them to get up to date.....


Chris Nokleberg wrote:

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:03:06PM +1100, Gavin King wrote:


Whoah but we have a dependency to proxool. Does that mean that integrating cglib 2 will
break our proxool support?




We will change the base package name before the next beta to prevent
binary incompatibility issues. I can send you another patch then. It's a
pain but I think the alternative is worse (for example a new version of
proxool was just released and it uses CGLIB 1.0).



I see the latest version of proxool isn't in "lib" but if you put it there it would be incompatible with the patch...that's why I mention it. If it is a problem we can change the package name now (after which cglib1 and cglib2 can co-exist), make a new patch, and release cglib2-beta2 for hib21-rc1.

Chris






------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel

Reply via email to