> I would rather you go the other way, i.e. unprefixed functions should be > portable ANSI-derived aliases which are mapped by the dialects to the > necessary names. For driver-specific functions you could potentially > have a prefix that indicates it should flow through into the resulting > xml, e.g. raw:some_oracle_function(). But hopefully the aliases will > cover 99% and you can use normal SQL for the rest.
Yes, that makes more sense. Since HQL is a legitimate query language, you would only want to explicitly distinguish elements that are *not* within the scope of the language (e.g. by using a prefix like raw:, native:, or sql:) to prevent confusing users. Is this feasible to implement? Les ------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
