Lazy components seem redundant to me. A similar effect can be achieved by using a one to one association (many to one, where many is one).
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Gavin King > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:03 PM > To: hibernate-devel > Subject: [Hibernate] Lazy components > > > I have an experimental (working) implementation of lazy > components in my sandbox. To be honest, I don't really like > it very much. I can't really support collections in lazy > components without adding waaay too much complexity, so I > would have to put what seem like arbitrary restrictions upon > this functionality. And I just plain don't think that > lazy > components are such a great idea in terms of performance. It > would be mostly a "marketing" feature and I don't like > useless features bloating the codebase. > > Does anyone *really* want this feature? > > -- > Gavin King > JBoss Group > +61 410534454 > http://hibernate.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438> &op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
