Inline
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:48:20 +1100, Gavin King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then there is the whole sequencing of the resulting Object[] ?
I would rather have addXxx order as significant
If we want to keep the strict ordering scalar-first, entities-last
Why do we want to keep that one?
then I would
like to force the users to obey to this in their code. This could be done by
simply having addScalar check that no entities have been added - and otherwise
throw an exception telling about the sequence needed ?
-max
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
