I agree. This is pretty much all we need to say about this.
On 06/27/2012 01:19 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
This was already proposed to the list a while back: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg03462.html so I'd like to close this issue by adopting the proposed text; specifically: 1) Section 5.2.7 (Diffie Hellman) OLD TEXT: The MODP Diffie-Hellman groups are defined in [RFC3526]. The ECDH groups 8 - 10 are defined in [RFC5903] and [RFC6090]. ECDH group 7 is covered in Appendix D. NEW TEXT: The MODP Diffie-Hellman groups are defined in [RFC3526]. The ECDH groups 7 - 9 are defined in [RFC5903] and [RFC6090]. ECDH group 10 is covered in Appendix D. Any ECDH used with HIP MUST have a co-factor of 1. 2) Section 5.2.9 (HOST ID) OLD TEXT: ... For ECC we distinguish two different profiles: ECDSA and ECDSA_LOW. ECC contains curves approved by NIST and defined in RFC 4754 [RFC4754]. ECDSA_LOW is defined for devices with low computational capabilities and uses shorter curves from SECG [SECG]. ... For ECC we distinguish two different profiles: ECDSA and ECDSA_LOW. ECC contains curves approved by NIST and defined in RFC 4754 [RFC4754]. ECDSA_LOW is defined for devices with low computational capabilities and uses shorter curves from SECG [SECG]. Any ECDSA used with HIP MUST have a co-factor of 1. _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
_______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
